| Adaptive Entrepreneurship and Taiwan's Economic Dynamics | | | |
-
<< Back to editing
-
Previous version by
-
-
<< Older
-
Newer >>
-
Revert to this one
search results
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
/index.php?action=ajax&rs=GDMgetPage&rsargs[]=laissezfaire24_5.pdf&rsargs[]=0
__________________________________________________________________
Fu-Lai
Tony
Yu
,
Ho-Don
Yan
and
Shan-Yu
Chen
Adaptive
Entrepreneurship
and
Taiwan
’
s
Economic
Dynamics
INTRODUCTION
The
economic
success
of
Taiwan
during
the
post-World
War
period
is
well
known
.
Taiwan
has
been
referred
to
by
the
World
Bank
in
1993
as
one
of
the
economies
which
contributes
to
“
East
Asian
Miracles
.”
Explanations
on
economic
success
of
Taiwan
are
not
lacking
.
1
However
,
most
of
them
utilize
neoclassical
Cobb-Douglas
production
function
to
explain
Taiwan
’
s
economic
growth
.
Specifically
,
these
studies
,
ignoring
structural
uncertainty
and
knowledge
problems
,
never
consider
the
role
of
entrepreneurship
in
economic
development
.
Hence
,
these
orthodox
neoclassical
studies
have
failed
to
provide
us
with
a
satisfactory
explanation
of
the
economic
development
of
Taiwan
.
Entrepreneurship
is
often
regarded
as
a
locomotive
of
economic
growth
.
A
systematic
investigation
of
the
role
of
entrepreneurship
in
economic
development
is
of
utmost
importance
.
Moreover
,
in
explaining
economic
1
For
example
,
Kuo
(
1997
)
argues
that
the
economic
success
of
Taiwan
is
attributed
to
government
policies
including
curbing
hyperinflation
of
the
early
1950s
,
utilization
of
US
aid
,
land
reform
,
trade
strategies
,
creation
of
job
opportunities
,
foreign
direct
investment
,
and
policies
on
infrastructure
.
Shih
(
1994
)
argues
that
major
factors
contributing
to
Taiwan's
economic
development
include
the
external
environment
,
the
colonial
legacy
,
the
development
of
East
Asian
developing
economies
,
scholars
largely
refer
to
Schumpeter
’
s
concept
of
entrepreneurship
.
Schumpeterian
entrepreneurship
has
actually
been
a
rare
phenomenon
in
most
developing
countries
,
and
even
in
many
industrialized
economies
.
The
emergence
of
individuals
with
‘
heroic
entrepreneurial
’
character
was
not
an
essential
condition
for
the
development
of
dynamic
Asian
capitalist
economies
,
since
rapid
growth
in
developing
economies
took
place
even
without
such
entrepreneurs
.
Therefore
,
when
examining
the
economic
dynamism
of
Asian
developing
economies
,
no
undue
emphasis
should
be
put
on
the
Schumpeterian
mode
of
entrepreneurship
.
Owing
to
this
reason
,
this
paper
attempts
to
develop
a
theory
of
entrepreneurship
which
can
explain
the
economic
development
of
Asian
latecomer
economies
.
This
theory
of
entrepreneurship
should
encompass
elements
such
as
adaptiveness
to
change
,
alertness
to
opportunities
,
incremental
innovation
and
imitation
which
are
the
major
characteristics
of
entrepreneurship
in
Asian
learning
economies
.
Fu-Lai
Tony
Yu
,
Ho-Don
Yan
and
Shan-Yu
Chen
are
professors
in
the
Department
of
Economics
,
Feng
Chia
University
,
Taichung
,
Taiwan
.
Prof
.
Yan
presented
a
preliminary
version
of
this
paper
at
the
31
st
Annual
Conference
,
Association
of
Private
Enterprise
Education
,
Las
Vegas
,
April
2-4
,
2006
.
The
authors
thank
Dian
Kwan
for
her
proof-reading
in
this
paper
.
role
of
the
state
and
ethnic
cleavage
.
__________________________________________________________________
Laissez-Faire
57
/index.php?action=ajax&rs=GDMgetPage&rsargs[]=laissezfaire24_5.pdf&rsargs[]=1
__________________________________________________________________
Against
the
backgrounds
mentioned
above
,
this
paper
has
two
objectives
:
Firstly
,
it
will
develop
a
theory
of
entrepreneurship
which
is
able
to
explain
economic
dynamism
of
Asian
latecomer
economies
in
general
and
Taiwan
in
particular
.
Secondly
,
this
paper
will
apply
the
theory
of
entrepreneurship
developed
in
this
paper
to
explain
the
economic
dynamics
of
Taiwan
.
In
particular
,
this
research
will
examine
the
kinds
of
entrepreneurial
strategies
adopted
by
business
people
in
Taiwan
.
Such
strategies
enable
Taiwan
’
s
firms
to
successfully
compete
and
survive
in
the
global
markets
.
By
using
electronics
industries
as
illustration
,
this
study
will
shed
light
on
the
role
that
entrepreneurship
plays
in
the
economic
transformation
of
Taiwan
.
STUDIES
ON
TAIWANESE
ENTREPRE-
NEURSHIP
The
significance
of
entrepreneurship
in
Taiwan
’
s
economic
dynamics
is
largely
investigated
by
scholars
in
management
or
social
science
rather
than
by
mainstream
neoclassical
economists
.
Numazaki
(
1997
)
describes
six
basic
characteristics
of
“
Laoban
”
(
entrepreneur-owner
)
in
Taiwan
and
analyzes
the
structural
features
of
the
Chinese
family
and
Taiwan
society
that
incubate
entrepreneurship
.
In
Numazaki
’
s
view
,
the
majority
of
Taiwan
’
s
entrepreneurs
were
independent
owner-managers
of
small
and
mediumscale
firms
.
These
entrepreneurs
skillfully
used
personal
networks
for
business
purposes
.
Furthermore
,
Numazaki
argues
that
it
was
the
Chinese
family
and
Taiwan
society
that
gave
birth
to
and
cultivated
entrepreneurship
in
Taiwan
.
The
Taiwan
society
as
a
complex
network
of
personal
networks
provided
entrepreneurs
a
social
context
that
suited
their
partnership-oriented
and
guanxi-oriented
business
activities
.
Shieh
(
1992
)
argues
that
the
export-oriented
industrialization
of
Taiwan
is
sustained
through
a
network
of
contracting
systems
and
a
microentrepreneurial
mechanism
.
The
subcontracting
system
generates
opportunities
for
workers
in
Taiwan
to
set
up
their
own
manufacturing
firms
.
Taiwan
’
s
electronics
industry
and
its
technological
catching-up
have
been
the
interests
of
scholars
of
technology
management
(
Hobday
1995
;
Ernst
1998
;
Chang
and
Tsai
2002
;
Matthews
2001
,
2002
,
2004
).
In
particular
,
Ernst
(
1998
)
tells
the
story
of
how
small
computer
firms
in
Taiwan
competed
in
international
markets
for
computer-related
products
.
In
Ernst
’
s
view
,
inter-organizational
knowledge
creation
for
small
firms
was
facilitated
by
(
1
)
active
and
continuously
adjusted
industrial
development
policies
,
and
(
2
)
learning
and
capability
formation
through
linkages
with
large
foreign
firms
.
In
a
comparative
study
of
Asian
Newly
Industrialized
Economies
and
using
electronics
industry
as
an
illustration
,
Hobday
(
1995
)
explores
how
small
Taiwanese
firms
acquired
technology
,
overcame
the
disadvantages
of
small
scale
and
managed
their
way
into
international
markets
.
Matthews
(
1997
,
2001
,
2002
,
2004
),
using
Acer
and
other
electronics
firms
in
Taiwan
as
case
studies
,
is
able
to
show
that
latecomer
firms
“
can
utilize
the
existing
and
latent
inter-firm
connections
of
the
global
economy
to
accelerate
their
global
growth
.
By
drawing
themselves
into
such
linkages
,
they
can
leverage
entry
into
new
markets
far
more
rapidly
than
by
following
the
stolid
entry
strategies
of
their
multinational
predecessors
.”
Despite
contributions
from
scholars
in
political
sciences
,
international
business
,
and
technology
management
,
the
study
of
the
role
of
entrepreneurship
in
Taiwan
’
s
industrial
dynamics
is
still
lacking
.
This
__________________________________________________________________
Laissez-Faire
58
/index.php?action=ajax&rs=GDMgetPage&rsargs[]=laissezfaire24_5.pdf&rsargs[]=2
__________________________________________________________________
paper
attempts
to
bring
back
entrepreneurship
in
understanding
the
economic
development
of
Taiwan
.
In
what
follows
,
a
theory
of
adaptive
entrepreneurship
applicable
to
latecomer
economies
will
be
formulated
.
The
theory
is
illustrated
by
Taiwan
’
s
electronics
industry
,
with
Acer
as
a
case
study
.
Policy
implications
will
be
given
in
the
last
section
.
ADAPTIVE
ENTREPRENEURSHIP
IN
LATECOMER
ECONOMIES
This
paper
utilizes
insights
from
the
Austrian
school
of
economics
to
develop
a
theory
of
adaptive
entrepreneurship
.
Specifically
,
Israel
M
.
Kirzner
’
s
contribution
to
the
concept
of
entrepreneurship
is
the
main
building
block
.
In
a
seminal
book
,
Kirzner
(
1973
)
argues
that
the
role
of
entrepreneurs
lies
“
in
their
alertness
to
hitherto
unnoticed
opportunities
.”
Alertness
implies
that
the
entrepreneur
possesses
a
superior
perception
of
economic
opportunity
.
It
is
like
an
“
antennae
that
permits
recognition
of
gaps
in
the
market
that
give
little
outward
sign
”
(
Gilad
,
Kaish
and
Ronen
1988
,
p
.
483
).
With
their
alertness
,
entrepreneurs
can
discover
and
exploit
narrow
profit
margins
.
Adaptive
entrepreneurship
can
be
observed
in
many
forms
,
including
putting
new
ideas
in
use
,
modifying
and
perfecting
original
innovations
,
adding
some
product
attributes
and
fitting
a
slightly
different
market
,
supplying
something
which
is
still
lacking
in
the
market
,
and
serving
the
markets
which
pioneers
have
created
but
have
not
yet
adequately
serviced
.
Adaptive
entrepreneurship
is
significant
in
the
economic
development
of
many
Asian
learning
economies
and
therefore
deserves
a
systematic
scrutiny
.
only
help
us
to
understand
economic
progress
of
many
developing
economies
,
but
also
allow
us
to
understand
international
development
in
the
era
of
globalization
.
The
notion
of
adaptive
entrepreneurship
in
Austrian
economics
is
associated
with
the
subjectivist
theory
of
knowledge
.
According
to
Kirzner
(
1985
),
knowledge
can
be
classified
into
two
types
:
(
1
)
Technical
knowledge
involving
skills
in
utilizing
given
physical
resources
.
This
type
of
knowledge
can
be
obtained
by
deliberate
search
or
via
R&D
.
(
2
)
Knowledge
of
opportunities
which
cannot
be
obtained
by
deliberate
search
but
manifested
in
entrepreneurial
capabilities
.
Economic
growth
can
thus
occur
in
two
ways
:
(
1
)
improvement
in
technical
knowledge
(
neoclassical
studies
largely
focus
on
this
aspect
of
research
),
and
/
or
(
2
)
increased
awareness
of
the
availability
of
opportunities
.
Hence
,
economic
growth
occurs
not
only
“
because
of
the
availability
of
new
opportunities
,
but
because
of
expanded
awareness
of
existing
opportunities
”
(
Kirzner
1985
,
p
.
74
).
Therefore
,
growth
requires
not
only
expanded
productive
possibilities
,
but
also
entrepreneurial
alertness
and
discovery
.
In
Kirzner
’
s
view
,
entrepreneurship
consists
of
the
social
integration
of
the
innumerable
scraps
of
existing
information
that
are
scattered
throughout
the
globe
.
2
The
same
entrepreneurial
spirit
also
tends
to
stimulate
the
discovery
or
creation
of
entirely
new
information
to
satisfy
consumers
’
preferences
.
Kirzner
argues
that
the
entrepreneurial
process
at
this
new
level
is
what
drives
the
capitalist
system
toward
higher
standards
of
achievement
.
2
Hayek
(
1945
,
p
.
519
)
notes
that
“
the
knowledge
of
the
circumstances
of
which
we
must
make
use
never
exists
in
concentrated
or
integrated
form
but
solely
as
the
dispersed
bits
of
incomplete
and
frequently
contradictory
knowledge
which
all
the
separate
indi-
A
theory
of
entrepreneurship
will
not
viduals
possess
.”
__________________________________________________________________
Laissez-Faire
59
/index.php?action=ajax&rs=GDMgetPage&rsargs[]=laissezfaire24_5.pdf&rsargs[]=3
__________________________________________________________________
In
the
following
sections
,
the
industrial
dynamics
of
Taiwan
will
be
explained
and
illustrated
by
the
concept
of
adaptive
entrepreneurship
manifested
in
“
guerrilla
”
strategies
,
small
scale
enterprise
,
subcontracting
,
product
imitation
and
regional
arbitrage
.
TAIWAN
AS
AN
ENTREPRENEURIAL
SOCIETY
For
the
past
six
decades
since
the
end
of
Japanese
colonization
,
Taiwan
has
created
an
environment
where
the
entrepreneurial
potential
of
its
people
can
be
fully
realized
.
As
a
result
,
Taiwan
is
crowded
with
entrepreneurs
and
regarded
by
one
scholar
as
a
“
boss
”
island
(
Shieh
1992
).
3
A
Taiwanese
joke
can
reflect
this
situation
:
if
you
throw
a
stone
in
the
streets
of
Taipei
,
you
are
likely
to
hit
a
chairman
of
the
board
.
With
one
company
for
every
twenty
people
in
Taiwan
(
the
highest
density
in
the
world
),
the
joke
could
almost
be
true
.
4
To
be
sure
,
this
“
army
of
ants
”
has
been
the
major
contributor
to
its
economic
miracle
(
Economist
1998
).
According
to
the
Small
and
Medium
Enterprise
Administration
(
SMEA
),
in
2003
about
97
.
8
%
of
enterprises
in
Taiwan
are
small
and
medium-size
enterprises
(
SME
’
s
),
and
they
make
up
75
to
80
%
of
all
employment
and
47
%
of
the
3
Shieh
(
1993
)
asserts
that
“
bosses
”
were
the
prime
movers
for
Taiwan
’
s
export-oriented
industrialization
and
the
development
,
which
was
made
possible
under
the
subcontracting
network
and
micro-entrepreneurship
.
4
According
to
the
Small
and
Medium
Enterprise
Administration
(
SMEA
2004
),
in
2003
there
were
1
,
171
,
780
enterprises
(
including
large
and
SME
’
s
)
in
Taiwan
.
With
a
population
of
23
million
,
every
twentieth
person
economy
’
s
GDP
.
Within
the
SME
’
s
,
9
.
7
%
of
them
last
less
than
one
year
.
5
According
to
the
Taiwan
’
s
Industry
,
Commerce
and
Service
Census
(
2002
),
between
1995
and
2000
the
survival
rate
of
these
enterprises
was
69
.
4
%.
The
ease
of
firms
to
establish
and
shut-down
indicates
the
dynamism
of
entrepreneurship
in
Taiwan
.
Business
Week
(
2004
)
claims
that
Taiwan
,
as
a
tiny
island
economy
,
has
triumphed
in
the
Information
and
Technology
(
IT
)
field
,
with
outsized
representation
on
Business
Week
’
s
IT
100
in
2004
.
Within
the
IT
100
,
fifteen
companies
are
from
Taiwan
and
their
founders
are
genuine
entrepreneurs
.
6
They
created
5
The
definition
of
the
SME
’
s
of
Taiwan
is
relatively
strict
compared
to
other
countries
.
For
manufacturing
,
construction
,
and
mining
and
quarrying
,
these
are
companies
with
paid-in
capital
of
NT
$
80
million
or
less
,
or
with
less
than
200
regular
employees
;
for
the
rest
of
industries
(
including
agriculture
,
forestry
and
fisheries
;
water
,
electricity
and
gas
;
the
commercial
sector
;
transportation
;
warehouse
and
communications
industry
;
finance
,
insurance
and
real
estate
;
industrial
and
commercial
services
;
and
personal
services
)
these
are
companies
with
sales
revenue
of
NT
$
100
million
or
less
,
or
with
less
than
50
regular
employees
(
SMEA
,
2004
).
6
The
list
of
companies
selected
is
based
on
the
requirement
of
having
revenues
of
at
least
$
300
million
,
and
then
using
four
ranking
criteria
:
return
on
equity
and
revenue
growth
(
which
were
given
equal
weight
),
shareholder
return
and
total
revenues
(
which
were
both
weighted
).
Within
these
100
companies
,
Taiwan
has
15
(
number
in
the
parenthesis
behind
the
company
name
is
its
ranking
)
including
,
Quanta
Computer
(
3
),
Hon
Hai
Precision
Ind
.
(
4
),
Compal
Electronic
(
15
),
Asustek
Computer
(
16
),
Au
Optronics
(
17
),
Novatek
Microelectronics
(
20
),
Lite-On
owns
a
company
.
Technology
(
21
),
Acer
(
25
),
Mediatek
(
35
),
__________________________________________________________________
Laissez-Faire
60
|
|